Cap'n Mike versus the Porkulus
Tuesday saw another warm, steaming pile of wingnuttery deposited on the paper's op-ed page under the title "Stimulus bill avoids hard choices." I won't bother with a line-by-line rebuttal this time, because Cap'n Mike drivel just isn't worth it. Instead, I'll provide the text of my emailed response to the paper. I'll let you know if they print it.
In his Guest View piece on March 3, "Stimulus bill avoids hard choices," Captain Mike Caldwell spends a lot of time worrying that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan (which he refers to simply as "the $787 billion spending package") has "no clear direction, no feedback mechanism, no system and no means to determine or measure success or failure" of its "ostensible objectives." As such, says Capt. Caldwell, "no hard choices need be made regarding either cuts in government spending or distinguishing among key economic determinants or programs."
If I were a cynical man, I might think that Capt. Caldwell was engaging in mere partisan sniping, since his worries about hard choices being left unmade would have been more timely a few years ago, when President George W. Bush and his Republican allies in Congress were spending money like drunken sailors. But I am a stranger to cynicism, so I will assume that Capt. Caldwell actually wrote this piece in 2004 or so, and mislaid it, and only recently found it again, and decided to have it published after updating the names.
If that is the case, then I salute Capt. Caldwell for his wise words. President Bush did indeed defer hard choices, and the result has indeed been, as Capt. Caldwell presciently says, "a recipe for disaster." I only wish Capt. Caldwell hadn't mislaid his wise words, so he could have delivered them five years ago when they actually needed to be said.UPDATE: Well, they printed it in the weekend edition, but it was overshadowed by a longer, better letter by Thomas R. Beall of Middletown.
5 comments:
Glad you didn't miss it!
Warren Caldwell is a registered Republican residing in Middletown. I do think it a bit disingenuous to use one name for the NDN & another for everything else. He is a registered Republican (shocker). At this point in time, anyone still ascribing to this toxic political Party, is totally hopeless; not to mention, clueless. Calling yourself a Republican Conservative is an oxymoron. But still they try.
What was more disturbing was the appearance of endorsement by the NDN when they printed a lengthy list of credentials of the writer, that was a first! Must be a friend of the publisher right wing Bucky Sherman.
Nah, they've actually done it before. They publish these things for public reaction. And it works!
Thanks for the comment.
First things, first. If you know (or strongly believe) that this guy is either a crack-pot or make believe, why bother to respond here or in the paper?
Second, the stimulus bill is a load of crap. It won't stimulate anything other than inflation and possibly another recession immediately following this current one.
And another thing, how disingenuous is it to pass $800,000,000,000 worth of deficit spending and then say you want to cut the deficit in half?
Yes. Bush's spending was moronic. That doesn't mean Obama's spending is better.
Porkulus, Bill, it's called the Porkulus.
Post a Comment