Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Trash- Boom & Bust!


The never-ending discussion continues. Kind of reminds me of a soap opera. New facts emerged last night. It seems that the Council Prez Rodrigues is now saying that the program was never expected to balance itself- at least in the short term. And you know what they say about the long-term- we'll all be dead.
The program was also termed a success. Of course, that's narrowing your definition to 50% of what the program was supposed to accomplish- no town costs. It's a bust in that regard. As for recycling- that's much improved. Typical good news-bad news scenario.

It's time to look at the facts. The fact is that the Council (Rodrigues, Mello, Santos, DiPalma, & Barrows) repeatedly promised costs only to the users. Yeah, we forgot to ask when this would happen. And they forgot to tell us. What we heard was that you paid for what you threw away & recycling was free. This was always a stretch & a questionable promotion. Recycling is NOT free. That's why you can't just put out recycling items (DiPalma wants these residents to STOP).

So this program is going into debt with fingers still crossed- maybe summer residents will use the system. And maybe they won't. How many households would this be? 40%? Still no decision on how/who's paying for the shortfall or for how long. But bag costs won't go up. So I guess everyone pays.
This program forgot one important requirement in its adoption: "And then a miracle occurs." I couldn't even get a 95% participation rate if I offered a free treat one day only at "The Freeze."

I evidently left before the rather tumultuous ending (Projo). Rodrigues evidently called Sylvia a liar & asserted that everyone on the Council was aware there would be program monetary shortfalls for awhile. Now the Prez knows of whence he speaks calling anyone a liar. While not usually inclined to bring up past shortcomings (which we all have, BTW), he is the only one who was ever accused of publicly lying during his campaign & then decided to fess up (about his sis- the Senior Ctr. Dir.). He then lost an election.

It's all a matter of semantics. Anyone reading the recent reports regarding trash could figure out that there was a problem. But lost $ wasn't given. However the press and the Council supporters focused on the recycling sucess. Now when someone actually brings the whole program into focus and wonders where the shortfall costs are going to come from- like the users who are supposedly supporting the system or the taxpayers, suddenly heads go in the sand and intimidation rears its ugly head.

I don't care if you don't like each other. I don't care who "the decider" is. Stop with insults and play nice. So you don't all agree. Shocking. Who cares? But let's get some answers for the contuing shortfalls. If we're all going to pay anyway, why not a program that everyone can live with?

The assertion by the Prez, et al, that you need to force residents to recycle by offering them money incentives, is just wrong, Daddy. Newporters recycle almost as much as we do with no incentives. Some businesses do the same with no commanding laws and no monetary incentives. That's because we're not all blooming idiots.

If you gave me the choice of "easing into" the program by letting me begin to recycle at my own pace & comfort level by not punishing me with increased costs (and very small bags), I would happily use the town program and I believe everyone else would too. So charge me a fee already. I'm a big girl and get it (although I'm smaller than I used to be after losing 50 lbs.).

Newport's program works. It's not necessary to re-invent the wheel. Renegotiate the contract. BTW, I didn't realize that we had given up 3 or 4 yrs. of recycling income. So what is it? It is our money, right? Monies given up are monies lost.

I've really had a belly full of the in-fighting. It'd say it's juvenile but that's insulting to juveniles. So some of the Dems don't like Sylvia & Silveira & have no plans to endorse them. Boo hoo. DiPalma is put out to pasture by leaving the Council & running for state office. So DiPalma is praised (at least for now) while the others are given the cold shoulder. One doesn't even pronounce Silveira's name correctly.
This trash system needs a conclusion. How much longer can this agony drag on? You'll never balance the system out, so why pretend? Don't tell me it's what works best for everyone, because it's just not true. It's a complex, confusing program. Even users, let alone non-users have problems with it. That's why some trucks now have cameras and periodically all the trash needs to be inspected for proper bag use.
Please don't tell me the State cares. It only woke up to the fact that there was a landfill problem a year or two ago. The Resource Recovery also has very limited recycling compared to what it could/should be doing. It also made pretty free with our money with its many varied charitable donations.

Hey, they shoot horses, don't they? Half of the system works, half doesn't. So fix the half that's not working rather than insulting the bearer of bad tidings. Even the cowardly lion finally found "the nerve" and the scarecrow found his brain. Neither really needed "The Wiz." This ain't rocket science.
Thanks to Projo's Meaghan Weems who stayed longer than I did.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

I am not surprised by Pres. Rodrigues comments calling his fellow councilor a liar, this is reflective of his attitude of my way or the highway, notice he also threatens to call his fellow councilors out of order in the event they happen to disagree with him!

Mr Sylvia is correct, it was plainly stated to the taxpayers this program would be self sufficient not the dismal financial failure it has become. The current leadership is inadequate. Let's just hope Mr. Sylvia and Silveira can continue to stand up to this immature idiot!

Is anyone that is still wondering why Mr Kempen left?

Anonymous said...

No, I'm not wondering, I understand he left due to undue pressure and interference from the current council president as well as religious discrimination. That's what the legal settlement is all about.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for all the comments.
I find it all beyond sad. So run for office! Like I've said many times- the more the merrier. Choice is good. Or support some candidates that you like.

Interestingly, the last that I heard, the local Dems did not intend to endorse either Sylvia or Silveira. But they seem to be keen on DiPalma for St. Senate. Go figure. They meet next Wed.

They HEART me. And I- them. LOL!

Anonymous said...

When are you going to wake up and realize Silveira and Sylvia are only out to oust a hardworking reasonable Town Council President. One reason the trash program isn't working properly is because of people like Sylvia who DO NOT use the program! As a Councillor YOU should lead by example...some example! And Silveira, how many times does it take watching his childish actions at council meetings, he's an embarrassment to the Town.

As for Kempen's departure..go back and review all the council meetings, isn't it weird that any question directed to Kempen, he directed to someone else? He was not one to take responsibility for his actions! Wake up taxpayers and start paying attention.

Anonymous said...

Well, duh! I couldn't convince 95% of Middletowners to use Frostee-Freeze for a free treat! I do believe one of the points of the trash program involves freedom of choice. Sylvia made no secret of his dislike of the program & his belief that it would never fulfill all of its promises. I call that being honest & not following the "because I say so" mentality. You think everyone would have signed up if he said nothing? Pu-lease!
Leadership doesn't involve terming someone a "liar" during an open meeting nor isolating other elected officials. Doesn't exactly foster confidence or voicing your opinion, does it?
I thought Kempen was doing what any good leader does- designating responsibility. The position is "Town Administrator" not "Town Do-It-All or Know-It-
All."
I do believe that the taxpayers are paying attention & therein lies the problem, my friend. Thanks for the thoughts.

Anonymous said...

Let's visit a little history, your council president had a reputation of burning children working under him at 2nd beach with cigarettes, failing not one, but, two sociological evaluations for Police employment, interfering with Middletown Police officer’s enforcement of traffic in front of a business he works for, engaging in political activities with his sister, the senior center department head and then lying about it to the residents of Middletown, appearing in the newspaper regarding multiple domestic violence issues, he is most recently accused of interfering with the former Middletown town manager, he goes on to suggest his council associate Robert Sylvia a liar simply because he disagrees with him, refuses to release requested public information requested by the public and the local newspaper and its still…. POOR PAUL? Please………… that has got to be his sister’s comment! This guy needs professional counseling not political office.

Anonymous said...

Interesting comments. This is why we have elections every two years, I guess. And from what I hear most are running again.
The Dems do believe that the Prez & Mello are running & I've heard two more names mentioned (more later).
No move to support Sylvia & Silveira (they haven't even been asked). The litmus test seems to be if you support non-partisan elections or not, although I've heard Mello support it formerly. Four Dems & 2 Republicans ran last time on the same ticket & promoted each other. Sounds non-partisan to me. Kinda later to change partners now. Ya dance with who ya brung.
There is trouble with Middletown Dems & despite assurances that the former split was resolved... you should expect fireworks.
Santos is running, I believe, although the Republicans aren't all that happy about it. I think that Barrows will pass. She now works in Prov. I've heard that they have candidates, but no names have surfaced.
Later---